NHK is starting to change its attitude to the truth. It’s finally starting to broadcast what is actually true.
On 12/28/2011 ,NHK reported ICRP’s manipulation in late 80s.
In this TV show ,NHK reported that ICRP manipulated the actual data for the political reason.
After Chernobyl ,the cancer rate in Sweden has gone beyond the estimation of ICRP.
In USA ,radioactive tritium from a nuclear plant increased cancer rate. ICRP standard has been known as a false “science”.
ICRP honorary committee ”Nobody would know the actual risk of low dose..”
“Even if you underestimated it to be half as actual ,it wouldn’t matter anyway.”
“There was no scientific basis. We just decided for our own good.”
In a area of Sweden ,where is affected by Chernobyl ,cancer rate is increasing but the annual dose is only 0.2 mSv ,which is one in fifth of ICRP standard.
Cancer risk increased by 34% annually.
Cancer risk is increased even if it’s only 10mSv unlike ICRP states.
A girl who got a brain tumor at 14 years old. Now she’s 18 but stopped growing since them. She lives near a nuc plant. She used to use the water underground. “Everyone died. Just I’m alive. It’s killing me.” Government kept telling them it’s safe based on ICRP standard.
Brain tumor and leukemia increased by 30%.
Childhood cancer increased by 200%.
“If they add facility modification ,it would need additional 369M USD investment.”
Janitors of a nuc plant,”We were guinea pigs. We were not informed of any risk.”
ICRP is supported by variety of countries of nuclear mafia.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission USA: $250,000 USD
Commission of the European Communities: $130,455 USD
Department of Nuclear Safety Germany: $115,021 USD
Japan Atomic Energy Agency: $45,000 USD
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission: $40,000 USD
etc..
Total: $617,168 USD
“We want them to know we are not just a number on the statistics.”
ICRP “honorary” committee, “Nuclear plants or nuclear labs asked us to lower the safety limit of the labors. so did the ministry of energy. If we apply the honest safety limit ,they thought they may not be able to handle the plants properly. Nuclear counselors in US insisted that we need to lower the estimation of the cancer risk in low dose occasion. It was to oppose the counselors who tried to raise the safety limit.”
At the first ,ICRP studied the radiation effect from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They thought 1000mSv of exposure raises the cancer risk by 5%. However,for the additional study of Japan and US government ,actually 500mSv of exposure raises the cancer risk by 5%. However ,ICRP decided not to raise the safety limit under 100 mSv of exposure. Moreover ,they decreased it by 20% ,so the low dose symptom is underestimated by 85%.
(Source)
(Source)
(Source)
低線量被ばく_揺らぐ国際基準_追跡！真相ﾌｧｲﾙ par gomizeromirai
Fukushima Diary can accept donation directly at bank.
Fukushima Diaryは銀行口座で直接寄付を受けられるようになりました。
情報は以下のとおり。
BANK : PIRAEUS BANK ROMANIA
USD
IBAN : RO53 PIRB 4205 7394 0100 3000
EURO
IBAN : RO87 PIRB 4205 7394 0100 2000
SWIFT : PIRBROBU
(FUKUSHIMA DIARY SRL)
Thank you for your donation ご寄付ありがとうございます。
Recurring Donations 毎月引き落とし
Fukushima Diary can accept donation directly at PoBox too. You don't need to write the receiver's name (Only the address below is needed) but you can write it as Mochizuki Iori or Fukushima Diary SRL as well.
Fukushima Diaryは私書箱でも直接寄付などの郵便を受けられるようになりました。下記の住所が記載されていれば受取人の名前を書く必要はありませんが、Mochizuki Iori または Fukushima Diary SRLというように書いても問題ありません。
情報は以下のとおりです。
OFICIUL POSTAL BUCURESTI 22 ROMANIA CASUTA POSTALA 110
Posted in 
I have been spreading your post here around. Do you have access to this video? People are very interested in gaining access. Do you know if video is in english?
Either way, it be great if you would be able to post video on you site, or at least a link to it. Thanks a lot!
This data is for external exposure and for a limited time: “500mSv of exposure raises the cancer risk by 5%.”
For Japan, limited time external, internal as well as inhaled and long term external exposures need to be added to each other. It amounts to more than 500msv.
Internal exposure of more than 50 bq are enough to cause DNA mutations.
Mochizuki – How Are You?
Is Your Fight For Truth Going Well?
Enenews, HuffingtonPost And Other Places Are Censoring My Voice – Many Others As Well.
Do You Know About This Movie?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNdh5A6MWK8
- Track Time 24:28 – Uploader Comments Suggest Monumental Conspiracy Underway -
Hello Mochizuki-san, congratulations for getting out of Japan and running as far from Fukushima as possible. It is a rational response no matter what anyone says. There is lots of pressure to act”normal” which comes from all directions in society, as if you are crazy to worry about nuclear stuff. But it is rational to be scared as hell and run. And it goes against that Japanese cultural pattern of ‘lets all die together’.
I live in Sydney, Australia and have just spent 6 weeks in Japan visiting family in Yokohama. For your information a doctor friend of mine told me of a conversation she had with a gynaecologist who is practising in Yokohama. I don’t know the gynaecologist’s name and can’t confirm the details. She told my friend that in her practise the still-birth rate over many years varied between 2 and 10 percent. Her practise is small with only 3 hospital beds and only in Yokohama. However in 2011 women who conceived at about the time of the accident have had a 50% miscarriage or stillbirth rate. And that is just in Yokohama! And yes my family are staying in Yokohama and Tokyo and Saitama…..Each day I wonder what will happen to them.
As a one year old child I was also exposed to nuclear fallout from nuclear tests conducted in the state where I lived at the time (Maralinga in South Australia). And yes I had asthma and swollen glands and infections and nose bleeds. It has been shocking to be reminded of it when I read some of the tweets from Fukushima mothers. THe levels I was exposed to were measureable, but very low, unlike Fukushima today.
I appreciate the work that you and some other bloggers have done and the information you have provided to everyone around the world. I look forward to your blogs in 2012. Best Wishes, Dean Brown
Traduction française:
http://aweb2u.free.fr/dotclear/index.php?post/2011/12/31/Pas-seulement-un-numero-sur-les-statistiques
Cordialement
Jeep
Thank you for this information! Your article is very important to understand why radiation is so dangerous considering we have no way to destroy the waste we create in nuclear plants and all plants have leakage events (often considered ‘normal’ or ‘not significant enough to impact health’ = pure B.S., IMO).
Mostly people talk about external exposure alone. Internal internal exposure by absorption through skin (especially when ‘wet), inhalation, or ingestion of radiation adds to the total exposure and therefore, increases risk of getting cancer. The following link is more evidence from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences’ risk model shows higher vulnerability of children in an article: ‘Nuclear Chivalry: Women and Children first to the graveyards.’ Overall, there is NO safe threshold for radiation dosage. Low dose radiation does effect the body although scientists don’t know exactly how damage from radiation occurs at the molecular level. One graph shows increased cancer risk of women and children at different ages compared to men given a 20-mSv exposure. There’s another graph that shows overall increased fatal cancer risk of women and children compared to men: 100%/21%! Good links on low-dose radiation at this site too:
http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddardsJournal#p/a/f/0/JE-NYkRR-lo
It’s been longer than 9months since 311. If someone still can’t distinguish internal exposure and external exposure ,the person is a totally idiot.
I never dreamed there would be a nice surprise from NHK in the end of the year. Surprise in itself is a nice feeling since no bad news seems to surprise me anymore.
Do your best as always! I’ll be rooting and will be more active on the point once I get away from Japan.
For various reasons my Escape plan will be executed in February.
And, since I hadn’t contacted you about this before, it is good to know you are safely out of the country.
Happier New Year!
I urgently recommend to read following paper on radiation value limits set according to commercial interests and not to protect health of people !! They differ from country to country though the health risk is the same everywhere.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76397531/Press-release-Background-Report-Ger
The ICRP which evolved from the 1928 International Committee on X-Ray and Radium Protection, was set up in the fifties to explore the health effects of radiation and [theoretically] to protect the public from it. In fact, both organizations have come to serve the industry rather than the public. http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html
A relative of mine is an obstetrician/gynecologist in Australia. I have asked her to look into this by means of a formal request to RANZCOG to make formal inquiries of their Asia-Pacific medical specialist affiliates.
I just hope that the World Health Organization does not have power of veto over what questions Aussie obstetrician-gynaecologists are allowed to ask their Japanese colleagues!! The world’s doctors should demand an honest answer on this. It is over NINE MONTHS since Fuku blew up.
(oops, please add that my previous post was a reply to Dean Brown’s post http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/12/icrp-underestimated-the-low-dose-symptom-risk-by-85/#comment-67693
[...] The Nuclear Disaster Cover Up Continues ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85% [...]
[...] [...]
[...] du blog fukushima-diary vient de publier un résumé-traduction du reportage sur la CIPR que la NHK a diffusé le 28/12 ; c’est absolument consternant ! On y apprend entre autres que [...]
[...] ICRP is the sales department of international nuclear industry, but they decide you are not to be exposed to more than 1mSv per year. The point is they don’t say you should not eat more than 10 Bq/Kg etc… Instead, they decided the formula to convert Bq/Kg into Sv. This is like “how much you have your stomach burnt if you swallow burning coal”, and this is decided for the political reason. From their political conversion rate, you are supposed to be safe even if you eat something of 100 Bq/Kg. There is no reason for the government to have to reply on ICRP, but because their safety regulation is very lax, it’s popular among nuclear governments. (cf, ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85% [Link 2]) [...]