ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85%
NHK is starting to change its attitude to the truth. It’s finally starting to broadcast what is actually true.
On 12/28/2011 ,NHK reported ICRP’s manipulation in late 80s.
In this TV show ,NHK reported that ICRP manipulated the actual data for the political reason.
After Chernobyl ,the cancer rate in Sweden has gone beyond the estimation of ICRP.
In USA ,radioactive tritium from a nuclear plant increased cancer rate. ICRP standard has been known as a false “science”.
ICRP honorary committee “Nobody would know the actual risk of low dose..”
“Even if you underestimated it to be half as actual ,it wouldn’t matter anyway.”
“There was no scientific basis. We just decided for our own good.”
In a area of Sweden ,where is affected by Chernobyl ,cancer rate is increasing but the annual dose is only 0.2 mSv ,which is one in fifth of ICRP standard.
Cancer risk increased by 34% annually.
Cancer risk is increased even if it’s only 10mSv unlike ICRP states.
A girl who got a brain tumor at 14 years old. Now she’s 18 but stopped growing since them. She lives near a nuc plant. She used to use the water underground. “Everyone died. Just I’m alive. It’s killing me.” Government kept telling them it’s safe based on ICRP standard.
Brain tumor and leukemia increased by 30%.
Childhood cancer increased by 200%.
“If they add facility modification ,it would need additional 369M USD investment.”
Janitors of a nuc plant,”We were guinea pigs. We were not informed of any risk.”
ICRP is supported by variety of countries of nuclear mafia.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission USA: $250,000 USD
Commission of the European Communities: $130,455 USD
Department of Nuclear Safety Germany: $115,021 USD
Japan Atomic Energy Agency: $45,000 USD
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission: $40,000 USD
Total: $617,168 USD
“We want them to know we are not just a number on the statistics.”
ICRP “honorary” committee, “Nuclear plants or nuclear labs asked us to lower the safety limit of the labors. so did the ministry of energy. If we apply the honest safety limit ,they thought they may not be able to handle the plants properly. Nuclear counselors in US insisted that we need to lower the estimation of the cancer risk in low dose occasion. It was to oppose the counselors who tried to raise the safety limit.”
At the first ,ICRP studied the radiation effect from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They thought 1000mSv of exposure raises the cancer risk by 5%. However,for the additional study of Japan and US government ,actually 500mSv of exposure raises the cancer risk by 5%. However ,ICRP decided not to raise the safety limit under 100 mSv of exposure. Moreover ,they decreased it by 20% ,so the low dose symptom is underestimated by 85%.