Environmental consequence analysis by JAEA shows the worse contamination situation than monitoring data by MEXT
According to JNES’s report “Severe Accident Analyses of Fukushima-Daiich Units 1 to 3” published on IAEA general conference of 9/17/2012, environmental consequence analysis by JAEA shows significant difference from the monitoring data by MEXT.
JAEA conducted preliminary environmental consequence analysis with the OSCAAR code developed by JAEA for level 3 PSA.
L’analyse des conséquences environnementales de la JAEA montre une situation de contamination pire que celle du MEXT
Selon le rapport du JNES, “Analyses de l’accident grave des unités 1 à 3 de Fukushima-Daiichi” publié lors de la la conférence générale de l’AIEA du 17 septembre 2012, l’analyse des conséquences environnementales de la JAEA présente des différences significatives avec les données des bornes de surveillance du MEXT.
This website updates the latest news about the Fukushima nuclear plant and also archives the past news from 2011. Because it's always updated and added live, articles, categories and the tags are not necessarily fitted in the latest format.
I am the writer of this website. About page remains in 2014. This is because my memory about 311 was clearer than now, 2023, and I think it can have a historical value. Now I'm living in Romania with 3 cats as an independent data scientist.
Actually, nothing has progressed in the plant since 2011. We still don't even know what is going on inside. They must keep cooling the crippled reactors by water, but additionally groundwater keeps flowing into the reactor buildings from the broken parts. This is why highly contaminated water is always produced more than it can circulate. Tepco is planning to officially discharge this water to the Pacific but Tritium is still remaining in it. They dilute this with seawater so that it is legally safe, but scientifically the same amount of radioactive tritium is contained. They say it is safe to discharge, but none of them have drunk it.