National Institute of Infectious Diseases changed the past rubella case number of 2011 and 2012
Rubella cases are reported unusually frequently in 2013.
(cf, Rubella case explosively spiking up “acceleratingly increasing since April 2011″ [URL])
(cf, Rubella cases spiked up 35 times much in Osaka within 3 months [URL 2])
National Institute of Infectious Diseases publish the reports about rubella cases weekly.
From the research of Fukushima Diary, they changed the past cumulative rubella cases number in 2011 and 2012 this April.
In their report of 4/10/2013, the number of 2011 is 371 and the one of 2012 is 2,353.
However in their report of 4/17/2013, the number of 2011 is 378 (↑7), the one of 2012 is 2,392 (↑39).
Since 4/17/2013, they have been commenting on their weekly reports that “Due to the potential addition and revision, cumulative number of rubella cases in past years may change.”
↓ The report published on 4/10/2013. There is no specific statement. [URL 3]
↓ The report published on 4/17/2013. The note reads “Until they sum up the definitive value, the cumulative number of each year may change.” [URL 4]
↓ The report published on 6/26/2013. There is a note but it’s different from the one above. It reads “Due to the potential addition and revision, the cumulative number of each year may change.” [URL 5]
L’Institut National des Maladies Infectieuses (National Institute of Infectious Diseases) publie hebdomadairement des rapports sur les cas de rubéole.
Les recherches du Fukushima Diary montrent qu’ils ont changé en avril dernier les valeurs des cumuls des cas de rubéole de 2011 et 2012.
Dans leur rapport du 10 avril 2013, le total de 2011 est de 371 et il est de 2 353 pour 2012.
Dans leur rapport du 17 avril 2013, le total de 2011 est de 378 (↑ 7), et celui de 2012 passe à 2 392 (↑ 39).
depuis le 17 avril 2013, ils commentent leurs rapports hebdomadaires avec un “A cause de possibles additions et rectifications, le nombre cumulé des cas de rubéole des années précédentes peut changer.”
↓ Le rapport du 10 avril 2013. Il n’y a pas d’avis particulier. [Lien1]
↓ Le rapport du 17 avril 2013.. La note dit : “Le cumul annuel de chaque année peut changer tant qu’ils ne cumulent pas les valeurs définitives.” [Lien2]
Ne les laissez pas dominer la vérité juste parce qu’ils sont riches.
About this site
This website updates the latest news about the Fukushima nuclear plant and also archives the past news from 2011. Because it's always updated and added live, articles, categories and the tags are not necessarily fitted in the latest format.
I am the writer of this website. About page remains in 2014. This is because my memory about 311 was clearer than now, 2023, and I think it can have a historical value. Now I'm living in Romania with 3 cats as an independent data scientist.
Actually, nothing has progressed in the plant since 2011. We still don't even know what is going on inside. They must keep cooling the crippled reactors by water, but additionally groundwater keeps flowing into the reactor buildings from the broken parts. This is why highly contaminated water is always produced more than it can circulate. Tepco is planning to officially discharge this water to the Pacific but Tritium is still remaining in it. They dilute this with seawater so that it is legally safe, but scientifically the same amount of radioactive tritium is contained. They say it is safe to discharge, but none of them have drunk it.