Uncategorized

English radiation survey map shows radiation levels by taking down a figure one place

Following up this article..[Survey map] West side of reactor1, 1.1 mSv/h (June) → 1.7 mSv/h (July) [URL]

On 6/6/2013, Fukushima Diary reported “English version of Fukushima plant survey map shows atmospheric dose lower than Japanese version by 90% [URL 2]”

In the latest map, Tepco lowered the readings (Only the ones above 1mSv/h) of the English survey map by taking down a figure one place again.

 

East side of reactor3

(Japanese version → English version)

4,500 μSv/h → 450 μSv/h

1,500 μSv/h → 150 μSv/h

 

West side of reactor1

1,700 μSv/h → 170 μSv/h

 

They adjusted the figures in the English report published in June as well.

Tepco’s hasn’t stated if it’s a continuous mistake or intentional.

 

↓ Japanese version

English radiation survey map shows high radiation levels by taking down a figure one place

 

↓ English version

2 English radiation survey map shows high radiation levels by taking down a figure one place

 

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130724-e.pdf

http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130724-j.pdf

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130618-e.pdf

http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130618-j.pdf

 

Don’t be their accomplice.

_____

Français :

See also

La version anglaise de carte de surveillance de la radioactivité affiche par endroits des niveau minimisés

 

Article lié : [Carte de surveillance] Côté ouest du réacteur 1 : 1,1 mSv/h (Juin) → 1,7 mSv/h (Juillet)

Le 6 juin 2013, le Fukushima Diary Publiait La version anglaise de la carte des doses ambiantes de la centrale de Fukushima présente des doses inférieures de 90 % à celles de la version japonaise

Pour sa dernière mise à jour de cette carte, dans la version anglaise Tepco a encore réduit les valeurs relevées de certains endroits (uniquement ceux au-dessus de 1 mSv/h).

Est du réacteur 3
(version japonaise → anglaise)
4 500 μSv/h → 450 μSv/h
1 500 μSv/h → 150 μSv/h

Ouest du réacteur 1
1 700 μSv/h → 170 μSv/h

En juin, ils avaient trafiqué les schémas de la même façon aussi.
Tepco n’a pas donné de justification permettant de discerner s’il s’agit d’un erreur répétée ou d’une volonté délibérée.

↓ version japonaise

English radiation survey map shows high radiation levels by taking down a figure one place

↓ version anglaise

2 English radiation survey map shows high radiation levels by taking down a figure one place

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130724-e.pdf
http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130724-j.pdf
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130618-e.pdf
http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/f1/surveymap/images/f1-sv2-20130618-j.pdf

Ne soyez pas leurs complices.

Mochizuki
Mochizuki
The writer of Fukushima Diary.
Related
Previous [Survey map] West side of reactor1, 1.1 mSv/h (June) → 1.7 mSv/h (July)
Next Reactor6 temperature increasing after restarting coolant system, 27.6℃ → 28.0℃

3 Comments

  1. who cares? i for one cant understand the difference of 2MSVH & 1500000000000000000 becquerels.. other day i was confused of whether beq/kg or beq/liter was ‘more worse’. can someone plz make a list of “standards & practices” in ‘common sense of safe radiology’? guess will learn the hard way soon after buying a Geiger Counter.. measure myself in ode to that unnamed man from Hitachi Ibaraki. rest his poor ‘macudo nanmin’ soul.

    self-destruction is the only way out of here… never miss it until its gone.

    still think your are safe a billion miles from Fukushima? Guess Again… you are the bigger bird ready to be fried!

    If Arctic Methane Is Released, the Fallout Will Cost $60,000,000,000,000

    By Salvatore Cardoni | Takepart.com July 24, 2013 Takepart.com Nature

    Remember Arctic methane? You know, the ecological time bomb lurking inside the polar region’s thawing permafrost?

    Well, we now know how much the fallout will cost when and if this subterranean gas is ever released.

    $60,000,000,000,000.

    If you’re scoring at home, that’s $60 trillion. For comparison, the value of the world economy in 2012 was $70 trillion. The findings, which assumed 50 gigatons of methane would be released, were published today in the journal Nature.

    Last month TakePart covered in detail just what will happen if this buried gas ever gets released:

    Almost a quarter of the northern hemisphere is covered by permafrost. Entombed in this frozen ground is an awful lot of primordial organic material, mostly roots and leaves, which contains up to 1,700 gigatons of carbon—almost twice the quantity that’s currently in the atmosphere.

    Complicating matters, scientists aren’t yet sure of the gaseous form that the carbon in this prehistoric subterranean vault will take when the permafrost inevitably thaws.

    While many expect it to be released as carbon dioxide, there are also a growing number that say it could be secreted as methane, which is 20 times more effective than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere.

    “If we let out this methane, our best efforts won’t work,” said scientist Jason Box. “It’ll be beyond our control. This is the trajectory we’re headed on. It’s only a matter of time.”

    Arctic sea ice, which melts and refreezes each year, is eroding at an unheard of rate—about twice as fast as the rest of the globe. In 2012 alone, it was only 40 percent of the size it was in the 1970s.

    “Because the ice is also losing its thickness, some scientists expect the Arctic ocean to be largely free of summer ice by 2020,” reports The Guardian.

    Back to that $60 trillion pricetag. It’s laughably large, a fee Dr. Evil from Austin Powers would demand when threatening world leaders.

    But it’s only a fraction of the total amount that economists estimate climate change will cost the planet by 2040. That number is $400 trillion.

    So, estimating for about 8.73 billion Earthlings come 2040, the average cost of climate mitigation and cleanup will come to roughly $45,819.00 per person.

    Time to dust off your piggy bank!
    Related stories on TakePart:

    • Earth: Your Fragile Planet

    • Chilling Report: Earth Loses 300 Billion Tons of Ice Each Year

    • Obama’s Climate Plan: Buh-Bye, Big Coal

    • Is Climate Change the Ultimate Firestarter?

    Original source: takepart.com

  2. Toadstools will inherit the earth…AGAIN…..
    Jellyfish cope quite well with mutation…..
    Seaweed will have fun,, see Venice without googles sometime soon….
    My mulberry tree is going great with all the extra urban smog…
    Cheer up, saying I told you so when you’re 90 is something to look forward to.
    I just stick to proselytizing solar cooking…

  3. Now, there is a note in english version for July:
    ,,Following amount in the red frames were corrected on July 26, 2013.
    450 → 4500, 150 → 1500, 170 → 1700″

Comments are closed.

All Rights Reserved, but do share.

About this site

This website updates the latest news about the Fukushima nuclear plant and also archives the past news from 2011. Because it's always updated and added live, articles, categories and the tags are not necessarily fitted in the latest format.
I am the writer of this website. About page remains in 2014. This is because my memory about 311 was clearer than now, 2023, and I think it can have a historical value. Now I'm living in Romania with 3 cats as an independent data scientist.
Actually, nothing has progressed in the plant since 2011. We still don't even know what is going on inside. They must keep cooling the crippled reactors by water, but additionally groundwater keeps flowing into the reactor buildings from the broken parts. This is why highly contaminated water is always produced more than it can circulate. Tepco is planning to officially discharge this water to the Pacific but Tritium is still remaining in it. They dilute this with seawater so that it is legally safe, but scientifically the same amount of radioactive tritium is contained. They say it is safe to discharge, but none of them have drunk it.

Categories