According to Tepco, the radiation level of sea ground soil jumped up by 950% from November to December in 2012.
The sampling location was 2km offshore of Ukedogawa in Namie machi, where is in 4~5 km north from Fukushima plant.
It was 25Bq/Kg in November, it was 2,370Bq/Kg in December.
http://hibi-zakkan.net/archives/23767607.html
Iori Mochizuki
_____
Français :
Le niveau de la radioactivité au large de l’embouchure du fleuve Fukushima est devenu 95 fois plus fort en 1 mois
Selon Tepco, le niveau de radioactivité du fond de la mer est monté de 950 % entre novembre et décembre 2012.
Le lieu d’échantillonnage était à 2 km au large d’Ukedogawa dans Namie machi, qui est à 4~5 km au nord de la centrale de Fukushima.
C’était à 25 Bq/kg en novembre, c’était passé à 2 370 Bq/kg en décembre.
http://hibi-zakkan.net/archives/23767607.html
Fukushima Diary can accept donation directly at bank.
Fukushima Diaryは銀行口座で直接寄付を受けられるようになりました。
情報は以下のとおり。
BANK : PIRAEUS BANK ROMANIA
USD
IBAN : RO53 PIRB 4205 7394 0100 3000
EURO
IBAN : RO87 PIRB 4205 7394 0100 2000
SWIFT : PIRBROBU
(FUKUSHIMA DIARY SRL)
Thank you for your donation ご寄付ありがとうございます。
Recurring Donations 毎月引き落とし
Fukushima Diary can accept donation directly at PoBox too. You don't need to write the receiver's name (Only the address below is needed) but you can write it as Mochizuki Iori or Fukushima Diary SRL as well.
Fukushima Diaryは私書箱でも直接寄付などの郵便を受けられるようになりました。下記の住所が記載されていれば受取人の名前を書く必要はありませんが、Mochizuki Iori または Fukushima Diary SRLというように書いても問題ありません。
情報は以下のとおりです。
OFICIUL POSTAL BUCURESTI 22 ROMANIA CASUTA POSTALA 110

Posted in
Tags: 




If it jumped by 950% I thought it would mean it’s 9.5 times higher? No? Anyone?!
Sorry to bother you with that guys and gals… I’m really not that good at maths!
Yeah, 25 times 95 equals 2375 that would be 9500% increase.
25 times 9.5 equals 237.5 that would be a 950% increase.
It was 25Bq/Kg in November, it was 2,370Bq/Kg in December.
If 25 is 100 % than 2,370 will be :
( 2,370 X 100 )/ 25 which is … 9,480 %
I made worse errors ( see the square area calculations for CPM
But we Know it was a Typing error ( missed a zero ) Not a miscalculations simply because in the article title Iori mentioned the correct ” 95 Times higher ” evaluation .
Back from the diversion and to the core of the article , wasn’t that the time when Tepco reported faulty /disordered thermometers ( readings ) ?
Where from did the wind was blowing that day ?