Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack

On 3/11/2011, smoke was coming up from the north side of reactor4 before the first tsunami.

You see the smoke on the left of the pictures below.

Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack

 

Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack2

 

Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack3

 

Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack4

 

Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack5

 

Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack5

 

It’s after 0:50 in the video below.

 

 

 

 

 




Fukushima Diary can accept donation directly at bank.
Fukushima Diaryは銀行口座で直接寄付を受けられるようになりました。
情報は以下のとおり。

BANK : PIRAEUS BANK ROMANIA

USD
IBAN : RO53 PIRB 4205 7394 0100 3000

EURO
IBAN : RO87 PIRB 4205 7394 0100 2000

SWIFT : PIRBROBU
(FUKUSHIMA DIARY SRL)


Thank you for your donation ご寄付ありがとうございます。



Thank you for your donation. This is for the new Fukushima Diary corporation.
ご寄付ありがとうございます。これは新しく出来たFukushima Diaryの会社への寄付になります。
Donation

Recurring Donations 毎月引き落とし



Recurring Donations. This is for the new Fukushima Diary corporation.
毎月引き落とし。こちらは新しく出来たFukushima Diaryの会社への寄付になります。
Monthly donation



Fukushima Diary can accept donation directly at PoBox too. You don't need to write the receiver's name (Only the address below is needed) but you can write it as Mochizuki Iori or Fukushima Diary SRL as well.

Fukushima Diaryは私書箱でも直接寄付などの郵便を受けられるようになりました。下記の住所が記載されていれば受取人の名前を書く必要はありませんが、Mochizuki Iori または Fukushima Diary SRLというように書いても問題ありません。

情報は以下のとおりです。

OFICIUL POSTAL BUCURESTI 22 ROMANIA CASUTA POSTALA 110
 

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 Responses to “Reactor 4 heated before the Tsunami attack”

  1. ruth says:

    This is a home run! Thanks for posting a difinitive proof that the earthquake had a big role in the reactor meltdowns and that it was not just the tsunam. Tepco and many government agencies keep chanting over and over, it was the tsunami, an act of nature NOT the earthquake because this would mean that the plants were not safely built for a mojor earthquake and imply liabilty for damages on the part of Tepco and government.

  2. [...] 3/11/2011, smoke was coming up from the north side of reactor4 before the first [...]

  3. FC says:

    Great find!
    There is much discussion about this topic when people fault Arnie Gundersen for his theme that reactors were tsinami damaged instead of quake damaged.

    There may be liability fears on the part of TEPCO to avoid discussing the earthquake (more forseeable).

  4. ingo says:

    I feel so sorry. i have been depressed for weeks after 311. I now link a 4 minutes video and an article that suport the idea fukushimas desaster was man-made. To have this information strcuk me down for days. Only attempt to read this and view this if you are emotionally very stable. I am not sure if the depicted story is correct but the evidence listed in its numer is stunning enough to have it reviewed.

    Lets hope humankind will invent some kinds of till today unknown cures for radiation diseases.

    If you may find this articles to offensive please dont not feel offended by me. delete it. i wish all the best.

    LOVE PEACE

    Sources include:
    4 minutes Video of No damage prior to the tsunami http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZmcm-uJnk0&feature=player_embedded
    jim stones article with a chain of evidence that can not be refused easily http://jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima.html

  5. CaptD says:

    Prediction!
    I believe that the CURRENT PROBE into San Onofre will expose many more questionable tubes and also an ongoing coverup of safety related info that was concealed in order to sidestep NRC notifications. San Onofre has the worst safety record of all US reactors and it just makes sense that the Operator will be trying very hard to keep the lid on anything that draw attention to their reactor or it’s operation.

    The NRC gave the Nuclear Industry a “PASS” on the tube wear issue before on San Onofre and many of the other reactors around the Country http://wp.­me/p21p6a-­77L BUT NOW
    They are realizing that they have a much bigger problem than they first “imagined”­; metal erosion/weakness cannot be tolerated when the radioactiv­e leakage is not only high in temperatur­e and pressure but also high in amount of radiation!

    Would you use a dangerous leaking pressure pot day after day,… or would you be smart and replace it with something safer?

    Fragile tubes and a EARTH QUAKE could makes a large number of those tubes all fail; which is what I think happened in Fukushima!

  6. intel agent says:

    so… the reactor was empty? NO!!!!!!!!!!

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: penny auctions | Thanks to credit repair, seo services and st louis seo